Start with restraint. Do not clean, polish, scrape, bend, squeeze, or chemically treat the coin. Those actions erase evidence and can turn an interesting piece into ordinary damage.
What this classification means
Document observable facts, measurements, competing explanations, sources checked, and confidence level. A useful identification does more than name an unusual shape. It explains when in production the feature formed, what physical evidence should remain, and which ordinary forms of damage can imitate it.
Diagnostic evidence to record
Separate observation from interpretation and note what evidence would change the conclusion.
- Compare with certified examples and mint-production references, not viral price claims.
Repeatable method: start with Error or damage?, then use the identification workflow and value guide. The page below should add evidence specific to this error class, variety, coin, or damage lookalike.
Common lookalikes and failure points
Confident labels without recorded evidence are hard to audit later.
A practical examination sequence
- Confirm the host coin. Identify denomination, design subtype, date, mint, composition, and expected weight.
- Describe before naming. Write what the metal actually does without using a marketplace label.
Value factors
Research standard
Use United States Mint production references to understand how blanks, planchets, dies, collars, and presses work. Use major grading-service references to compare diagnostic language. Treat marketplace descriptions as leads to investigate.
Ready to start browsing?
See current Writing Good Attribution Notes listings on eBay →